No other human-caused global change has occurred so abruptly
as the increased nitrogen content of our natural ecosystemsnot
increased carbon dioxide, not increased human population, not
deforestation. That the first edition of
Issues in Ecology, a
new publication from the Ecological Society of America, focuses on how
people have altered the global nitrogen cycle indicates the importance
professional ecologists place on this problem.
Some of the earliest public attention to the issue
appeared in agricultural publications, which addressed the reproductive
problems of cows and sheep associated with nitrates in water supplies;
this was followed by attention to human health concerns.
Marine and estuarine ecologists weighed in next,
demonstrating the role of nitrogen in the overproduction of algae and
the changes in algal species in coastal and bay waters
"enriched" with nitrogen. In turn, the death and decomposition
of algae have led to low oxygen levels (anoxia), which causes mortality
in shellfish and fish.
Ecologists have noted the role of nitrous oxides
in acid rain and photochemical smog. More recently, they have discovered
reduced biodiversity of species in terrestrial ecosystems that are
heavily fertilized.
Figure 1. The nitrogen cycle.
Nicole Ferrari
The nitrogen cycle is based on natural events in
which atmospheric nitrogen is fixed into compounds, largely as ammonium
and nitrate, which are essential mineral nutrients for the growth,
repair, and reproduction of plants and algae. Nitrogen enters the food
chain through plants, where it appears in a variety of compounds like
amino acids. Then it is converted back to atmospheric nitrogen by
denitrifying bacteria that live in anaerobic (oxygen-free) mud, or it is
returned to the soil as a mineral nutrient by decomposers (Fig.1).
Nitrogen is fixed in a number of natural
processes. Some algae and bacteria convert atmospheric nitrogen into
plant-useable nitrogen. The best known of these live in a symbiotic
relationship with legume roots. Lightning is a much smaller source of
fixed nitrogen. Estimates of the annual natural nitrogen fixation prior
to the widespread planting of legume crops range from 90 to 140
teragrams (Tg). (A teragram is 1 trillion grams or 1 million metric
tons.)
Since nitrogen is often the mineral nutrient
limiting crop plant growth, humans have expended great energy increasing
its production in plant-usable form. One method is the widespread
cultivation of legume crops and forage, like soybeans, clover, and
alfalfa. More recently, the manufacture of inorganic nitrogen fertilizer
has skyrocketed to double the amount fixed by nitrogen-fixing crops.
These 2 sources add approximately 120 Tg of nitrogen per year.
Burning forests, grasslands, and fossil fuels
releases nitric oxides and other gases. The high-temperature combustion
also oxidizes some of the atmospheric nitrogen. Nitrous and nitric oxide
gases add the insult of forming acid rain and photochemical smog.
Even remote regions of the world receive some
nitrogen enrichment from atmospheric pollution, but because inorganic
fertilizer and legume crops, cars, factories, and power plants are not
evenly distributed across the Earth, some regions are more affected by
nitrogen release than others. Since nitrate, ammonium, nitric oxide, and
nitrous oxide dissolve in water, all end up eventually in groundwater
and in aquatic ecosystems (Fig. 2). The water in developed or highly
agricultural regions generally has the highest levels. Denitrifying
bacteria living in anoxic places (like the mud in wetlands) are the only
means by which fixed nitrogen naturally returns to the atmosphere as an
inert gas.
Nitrogen fixed in plant products is eaten by
animals and often returns to natural systems in the form of sewage or
manure, and some of the nitrogen is recycled into crops. Unless the
amount and timing of the manure or sludge spreading are carefully
monitored, much of the nitrogen from these sources also enters streams,
rivers, bays, or coastal seas. Large-scale aquaculture using inorganic
fertilizer can also produce severe nutrient loading.
Figure 2. Nitrogen often ends up in aquatic ecosystems.
Nitrate in drinking water can be dangerous for
young animals, including humans. In oxygen-poor stomach environments
nitrate is reduced to nitrite. Most adult humans convert only about 5%
to nitrite, but babies have less stomach acid, a condition that favors
nitrite production.
Fetuses and infants have a different form of
hemoglobin from children and adults. Nitrite combines irreversibly with
fetal hemoglobin, preventing it from carrying oxygen. For this reason
the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets a limit of 10 parts
per million (ppm) of nitrogen as nitrate for public drinking water.
There is no evidence that babies have died in the United States from
nitrate pollution, but in Europe, where levels of 2,000 ppm have been
measured, some have. Miscarriages and brain damage are also possible.
American farm animals have been affected, however.
Ruminants like sheep and cows, with their elaborate, highly anoxic
stomachs convert nitrate in water and nitrogen-rich feed stock to
nitrite. Reproductive failure in cows and sheep has been traced to high
nitrate ingestion on farms where wells have tested as high as 700 ppm of
nitrogen as nitrate.
Fertilization can change the relative competitive
relationships among species, favoring a few at the expense of many
others. Experiments on a Minnesota native grassland measured species
diversity from 20 to 30 species per square meter; this was reduced to
dominance by a single introduced grass after a number of years of
fertilization. Changes in species composition can occur in enriched
aquatic systems, also, although typically nitrogen is more likely to be
the growth-limiting nutrient in estuarine and marine systems while
phosphate is the growth limiter in freshwater environments.
Nutrient enrichment is implicated in red tide
episodes and in recent
Pfiesteria events in North Carolina and
Maryland (suspected to be precipitated by phosphate in hog and chicken
manure runoff). In both cases, naturally occurring toxic dinoflagellates
incurred huge population growth over a short period of time, causing
fish kills. A spring 1996 red tide in Florida also produced manatee
deaths from inhalation of toxic compounds.
Toxins from
Pfiesteria produce
neurological problems in humans, and the organism itself attacks fish
and human flesh. Thus, the impact of nutrient loading may range from a
loss of biodiversity to fish kills and human health hazards.
Nitrate enrichment can alter an entire estuary.
Phytoplankton growth is so dense in the summer in the Chesapeake Bay
that light penetrates less than 0.5 m. Sea grasses rooted in the bottom
have insufficient light for growth. As the phytoplankton sink to the
bottom, they are decomposed by aerobic bacteria, which can completely
deplete the oxygen in bottom waters during calm weather. Deeper waters
of the Bay experience anoxic events each summer. Sea grasses have
declined in many areas, also, mainly because of nutrient loading.
Just as the nature of the problemsewage,
fertilizers, manure, or power plantsvaries with the region, so does
the mix of actions to address these problems. Nitrogen that enters
systems from a specific sourcesuch as a smokestack or a sewage
outfallcan be addressed with regulations and technological solutions.
Most of the nitrogen sources are not within the
current scope of regulation, however. No one measures or regulates how
much fertilizer homeowners, farmers, or golf courses use. Although some
sources are very hard to regulate, we might curtail fertilizer use
through education, incentives, and taxes.
Because nitrate in water is easily and safely
measured and because its presence is a widespread problem, it makes an
excellent topic for class projects in ecology, environmental science, or
agriculture. During the summer of 1990, I started an environmental
science course for secondary teachers. Over a 2-week period we worked
our way across Maryland from the mountains to the sea, examining a
different environmental issue each day. The first mucky, algae-ridden
pond in the mountains barely registered a trace of nitrate (though we
did find a stream with a pH of 4.3).
Then we came down out of the mountains. The first
stop in dairy country produced 8 ppm of nitrogen as nitrate from a tap
at a fast-food restaurant. All across central Maryland we found 6 to 9
ppm in drinking water and in streams and rivers during that dry summer.
Algae and aquatic plants can reduce nutrient levels in ponds, lakes, and
bays, but groundwater and runoff record the story of nitrate pollution.
Figure 3. Students learn from hands-on testing of water samples.
From that class on, we have tested nitrate in
water. Over the years, the highest nitrate measured in teacher courses
was 15 ppm from a well in a very expensive residential area. Ironically,
that teacher brought her own well water to class to avoid drinking
"nasty" Baltimore tap water, which measured only 3 ppm at that
time.
Since nitrate is stable, teachers and students can
make water collections that represent wide geographic regions and
demonstrate nitrate pollution from a variety of sources. They can even
buy and test bottled water from all over the world.
Recently, a new nitrate test kit has been
developed by LaMotte Company that uses zinc reduction (eliminating
cadmium, a toxic heavy metal) and 2 simple tablets to measure nitrogen
as nitrate in ppm. Accurate as long as the chemicals are fresh, it is
both safe and easy to use. Consequently, when we rewrote
Living in
Water in its third edition, we included nitrate as an issue and
added 5 new exercises for nitrate, plus additional watershed activities.
Nonpoint source and point source nitrate pollution are measured and
modeled in the third edition of
Living in Water.
Ideally, first have students study nitrate
pollution in class. They then identify a nitrate-enriched environment
with these test kits (Fig. 3). Encourage them to ask questions about the
source of the pollution and the possible solutions. Classes may plan and
do projects that reduce nitrate pollution either through direct action,
such as planting forest buffer strips along waterways, or through public
education, such as encouraging individuals to reduce fertilizer use. The
kits can then be used to monitor the results of the student projects
over time.
Since each region varies, detailed ideas for class
projects should be researched locally. Have your students use the
Internet, email, or letters to contact state and local agencies as well
as conservation organizations and environmental educators. The Internet
may also lead your students to federal agencies such as the EPA, which
has information on nitrate pollution.
Nitrate pollution is a large-scale problem in
which each of us plays some role. While governments have a major role in
solving this problem, individual education and action are essential to
improve the situation.
Figs. 2 and 3 are adapted from
Living in Water with permission from the National Aquarium in Baltimore.
- Barker, Rodney. 1997. And the Waters Turned to Blood: The Ultimate Biological Threat. Simon and Schuster, New York.
- Greer, Jack. 1997. In harms way? The threat of toxic algae. Marine Notes,
University of Maryland Sea Grant Program 15:4.
- Matson, P. A., et al. 1997. Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277: 504509.
- Mitchell, Mark, and William Stapp. 1996. Field Manual for Water Quality Monitoring: An Environmental Education Program for Schools. Kendall-Hunt, New York.
- Vitousek, P. M., et al. 1997. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: causes and consequences. Issues in Ecology, issue 1.